Search for: "People v. Watts" Results 81 - 100 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 4:34 am by Mark Tushnet
(I used to waffle about the parallel issue in connection with Cohen v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nuvasive, 842 F.3d at 1383(citing Bowman Transp., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Just Security
Rohingya Perspectives on Post-Atrocity Justice by Rebecca Hamilton (@bechamilton) Provision of Healthcare by Islamist Armed Groups: Between Sharia and International Law by Marta Furlan U.N. and Human Rights New UN Special Rapporteur’s Report Underscores Risks of Abusive Counterterrorism by Cyprien Fluzin (@CyprienFluzin) Next UN Afghanistan Talks in Doha Must Hold Taliban to Account on Human Rights by Lisa Curtis (@LisaCurtisDC) Trump Trials The Right to a Unanimous Verdict and the Jury… [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
Watts, which holds that sentencing judges can consider acquitted conduct in imposing a sentence under the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by Kurt Schulzke
More background on the case can be found at the Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead and Watts, LLP v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 11:45 am
He should be in jail getting but f*cked by the people he abused and put in Jail. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:58 pm by Donna Bader
   Do you think cave people could have envisioned the evolution of the relationship between man and animal? [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
No. 40145/98)]; residents of a slum that was engulfed by a methane explosion from a neighbouring tip [Oneryildiz v Turkey (2004) 41 EHRR 20l]; and a local authority moving an elderly resident between care homes [Watts v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR 66]. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
Enough people think this case may have legs that a whopping fourteen amicus briefs were filed supporting the petition. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
Sergio Hernandez, Sean O’Key, Amanda Watts, Byron Manley and Henrik Pettersson report for CNN. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Underwood, the Supreme Court invalidated a similar provision of the Alabama constitution that disenfranchised people convicted of crimes “involving moral turpitude. [read post]