Search for: "People v. Waxman" Results 1 - 20 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2009, 8:12 pm
Waxman Chief Defense Lawyer Quinn Jones... [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:18 am
The much anticipated preemption case, Wyeth v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Along this line, compare Justice Scalia's discussion of text in the Hatch-Waxman Act in Merck v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:05 am by Neal Fortin
My morning distraction was reading the Hatch-Waxman 25th Anniversary Trivia by Kurt Karst. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:39 am by Lyle Denniston
Waxman, who tried to counter the legislature’s arguments by seeking to keep the focus on the sovereignty of the people, had no one on the bench cheering him on. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 10:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
article=1479&context=btljFurthermore, some people considered inter partes re-examination to be quite effective:Seehttp://sunsteinlaw.com/inter-partes-reexamination-digs-a-patent-graveyard/**Whether challenging pharma patents through non-Hatch-Waxman procedures evadesthe "balance" negotiated at the time of Hatch-Waxman can be contemplated. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm
Along this line, compare Justice Scalia's discussion of text in the Hatch-Waxman Act in Merck v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 7:20 am by Walter Olson
House of Representatives Related posts “Congressman Seeks to Send Critic to Jail” (0) Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:59 pm
The Supreme Court heard argument in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 9:40 am by Dan Ernst
Time Magazine asked seven historians for suggestions of people for President Trump to pardon. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:01 am by Eugene Volokh
” (The case was Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 2:26 pm
An arrangement of this sort between pharmaceutical giant Zeneca and generic manufacturer Barr Laboratories is at the heart of a case up for consideration on Friday by the Court, Joblove v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:49 am
They water it down in various ways to make it more palatable to various wavering people. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
But it also means that if some people do less to reduce emissions than expected, someone else will have to make up the shortfall. [read post]