Search for: "People v. Webb" Results 41 - 60 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2007, 2:31 am
Webb, defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTYReal Property Jerry Seinfeld Denied Dismissal, Directed to Pay Broker Commission on $3.95 Million Home Cohen v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Gundy talked about people being stewards of the earth, local pollution, slavery, neglect since consolidation and violence, among other topics. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 11:51 am
A ruling changing this “could be the Brown v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:48 am by Lee E. Berlik
(In other words, the court found it should exercise a gatekeeping function similar to that required in defamation cases, as outlined in Webb v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
  I don't know any of the people involved in these facts.Background "Cemeteries and golf courses are the worst uses of real estate." [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
  I don't know any of the people involved in these facts.Background "Cemeteries and golf courses are the worst uses of real estate. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
In 2002 the champ was, of all people, the Judge Advocate General of the Coast Guard, who was responsible for the only two certified issues during that calendar year. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:20 am by Adam Wagner
This was right at the time, because in the 1993 case of Stubbings v Webb the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) ruled that cases of deliberate assault or tresspass to the person fall under section 11, that is a 6 year time limit but with no discretion to extend. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:53 am by Elim
., The Law of Misstatements: 50 Years on from Hedley Byrne v Heller (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2015). [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Webb, No. 08-1331, 08-1332 Defendants' sentences for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base are affirmed over their claim that the district court erred at sentencing by applying a preponderance of the evidence standard to determine drug quantity in excess of that found by the jury beyond a reasonable doubt. . [read post]