Search for: "People v. Wells (1970)" Results 201 - 220 of 992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 9:00 am by David Oxenford
  The US District Court in Utah released a well-reasoned decision finding that the service, by transmitting via the Internet over-the-air TV programming to subscribers without any consent from the TV stations or their program suppliers, violated the copyrights that the stations have in their programming. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
  What these people had demonstrated during this period of time was that they did not recognize the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over HKSAR, and they did not support the policy of the “One Country, Two systems”. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
In the only dissenting judgment, Lady Hale observed that the parties had drawn the parameters of the appeal too narrowly (failing to focus of what she considered the nub of the case, namely the interpretation of s.2(1) Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970) and had missed the opportunity to challenge the decision of the bare majority in R v Gloucestershire County Council, Ex p Barry [1997] AC 584. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
” The constitutional protections offered to the institutional media have long been understood — in the early republic, around 1868, from 1868 to 1970, and in the great bulk of cases since 1970 as well — as being no greater than those offered to others. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:20 am by Stephen Gillers
From 1930 to 1970, Hegel was cited in ninety-one articles. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 9:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In the 1970s, we had a series of due process cases that rewrote the standard for general governmental fairness in decision making. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
But you should ask yourself, and your students, how that principle stands along the Court's decision in Barbra Smith v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 11:14 am by Pamela S. Karlan
” Back in 1964, likely no one in Congress thought lesbian, gay, or bisexual people should be protected. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]