Search for: "People v. Wells (1983)"
Results 1 - 20
of 994
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 1:14 pm
The bombing killed 241 people and injured many more. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
Berger v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
” Wells v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am
Thus, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, a rational fact finder could conclude that defendant acquired the video and exercised control over it and the images (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:41 pm
Johnson and People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:57 am
., People v Kinchen, 60 NY2d 772 [1983]). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:02 am
[Editor: In Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
The case is Thompson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:36 pm
Injuries can be psychiatric as well as physical, but the prosecution will need to provide medical evidence of this (R v Fook, 1994). [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
The Judge refused the claimant’s (Mr Andrew Cooper) application for an injunction under the Representation of the People Act 1983 (“the RoPA”), which sought to prevent the republication of a political advert published on West Midlands Labour social media pages regarding the claimant, who was at the time a Conservative candidate for the Tamworth by-election (held on 19 October 2023). [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 11:35 am
Think about whether you agree.I have a separate thought about post-hoc conclusions in these search and seizure cases that I'll briefly share as well. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 11:55 am
People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
You'll know where this case is going even when I just recite the first paragraphs of the statement of facts:"In 1983, eight-year-old James K. met defendant at the Santa Monica Pier. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:58 am
Well, no. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
ShareTuesday’s argument in Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:02 pm
Johnson and People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 9:48 am
Thore v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:38 am
Something that we may well be unable to fix. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:05 pm
" The answer, as Francisco tried to explain, but not as well as he perhaps could have, is that a big part of the purpose making the Bill of Rights (including the Takings) applicable against state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment was to ensure that people whose rights were violated by states could go to federal court to vindicate them. [read post]
