Search for: "People v. West (1980)" Results 61 - 80 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2017, 11:30 am
” None of them asked that precise question, but the President himself gave a chilling answer when he proposed the ban: Korematsu v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:52 am by Joseph Fishkin
  In the 2005 Supreme Court case of Castle Rock v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:52 am by Joseph Fishkin
  In the 2005 Supreme Court case of Castle Rock v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am by John McFarland
People came from long distances to bathe in its waters. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Green (1980), where the Court held that Bivens was available for a federal public-prison inmate despite the availability of the FTCA. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am by JB
Among its many other virtues, the opinions in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
The way things are going, many people can’t even seek comfort in simple escapism. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Jones, 298 N.W.2d 296, 298 (Iowa 1980). [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 12:38 pm by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
., as clarified and confirmed in Safari Club International v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:03 am by NBlack
In our view, contrary to defendant’s claim, Akshar did not use impermissible or fundamentally unfair or deceptive tactics to gain access to these accounts  (see People v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Becerra (2018) (dealing with compelled speech regarding abortion), and Janus v. [read post]