Search for: "People v. West (1980)" Results 161 - 180 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
The court distinguished Kearns on the basis that the defendant in that case, the Bar Council, was not a “public authority”; but it showed a clear preference for the (conflicting) approach in Wood v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [2005] EMLR 20. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
There is an obvious and material difference between being represented in proceedings which could result in a person’s expulsion from, or detention in the Commonwealth, being represented, and a person being represented for the purpose of the preparation of a report pursuant to s 62G of the Act, the weight given to which would be determined after the parties referred to in such report had the opportunity to cross-examine its author during the course of proceedings in the court in which… [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm by Fred Goldsmith
We had a swell time at the show, met lots of great people, and look forward to next year's show! [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm by ALeonard
  Before serving in the Clinton Administration, she had been a professor at the University of Chicago Law School and had done a few years of law practice after graduating from Harvard Law in the mid-1980s. [read post]