Search for: "People v. White" Results 61 - 80 of 5,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2015, 7:12 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources:Social Security Disability Insurance: A Lifeline for Millions of American Workers and Their Families, July 17, 2015, White House Blog More Blog Entries:Mays v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
Indeed, the court was unanimous that the plurality opinion of Justice Edward Douglass White in Downes is still the dominant interpretation of the Constitution's Territorial Clause, abandoning the rule set forth in Dred Scott v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:15 am by Giles Peaker
I understand the notes are to be corrected for the 2016 edition, but in the meantime, people should be aware of the problem. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:00 am by Vandenack Williams LLC
The over-prescribing of an opioid drug can create significant criminal and civil liability for a prescriber, as illustrated in the recent People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:18 pm
Thanks to Carter White for this: The Ninth Circuit today, in CPLC v Napolitano, upheld as constitutional the Legal Arizona Workers Act, that imposes state sanctions on employers who hire people who do not have federal work authorization. bh [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
How is harm, or the risk of harm, to be determined when different people react in different ways to what they are reading or hearing? [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Brian Shiffrin
People v Black (_ NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 08766 [11/3010]) is one of the four cases with Batson issues that the Court considered in People v Hecker. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
She had accessed the Bakersfield Police Department computer in reference to the White Lords of Bakersfield, a group that had written about how they were going to lock up colored people using the MDO program to incarcerate innocent people. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 3:14 am
  In doing so, the Court overruled People v Apgar, 264 Mich App 321; 690 NW2d 312 (2004). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Alethea Redfern
In the News  On Monday last week, the government published its long-awaited white paper on online harms. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the First Amendment doesn’t protect people who “incite violence” in the sense of engaging in speech intended to and likely to promote imminent criminal conduct (the Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:00 pm by Susan D. Carle
At the same time, there is a lot of historical recovery work to do and not that many people doing it, and it seems to me okay for all those interested in such projects to pitch in. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
To do so would be a continuation of putting the 'foxes in charge of the henhouse'.Please also make sure the White House is aware of Judge Davis's remarks in Capitol v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 am by Ms. Sarah Jones
Practitioners are often pastors or unlicensed religious counselors, and they have little to no professional oversight.That case, King v. [read post]