Search for: "People v. White" Results 81 - 100 of 6,451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2019, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
How is harm, or the risk of harm, to be determined when different people react in different ways to what they are reading or hearing? [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:15 am by Giles Peaker
I understand the notes are to be corrected for the 2016 edition, but in the meantime, people should be aware of the problem. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
She had accessed the Bakersfield Police Department computer in reference to the White Lords of Bakersfield, a group that had written about how they were going to lock up colored people using the MDO program to incarcerate innocent people. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:18 pm
Thanks to Carter White for this: The Ninth Circuit today, in CPLC v Napolitano, upheld as constitutional the Legal Arizona Workers Act, that imposes state sanctions on employers who hire people who do not have federal work authorization. bh [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:00 am by Vandenack Williams LLC
The over-prescribing of an opioid drug can create significant criminal and civil liability for a prescriber, as illustrated in the recent People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Brian Shiffrin
People v Black (_ NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 08766 [11/3010]) is one of the four cases with Batson issues that the Court considered in People v Hecker. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 2:44 pm
Sometimes even good bets don't pay off.Rami Al-Zetawi gets arrested for animal cruelty when his neighbors allegedly see him beat and injure his white husky dog in the front yard of his home. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 12:26 am by Eric G. Young
I understand that statement offends some white people, threatens them to their very core, but it remains true nonetheless. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
And the First Amendment doesn’t protect people who “incite violence” in the sense of engaging in speech intended to and likely to promote imminent criminal conduct (the Brandenburg v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 5:04 am
To do so would be a continuation of putting the 'foxes in charge of the henhouse'.Please also make sure the White House is aware of Judge Davis's remarks in Capitol v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:00 pm by Susan D. Carle
At the same time, there is a lot of historical recovery work to do and not that many people doing it, and it seems to me okay for all those interested in such projects to pitch in. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:45 am by Jonathan H. Adler
It is certainly true that this sort of strategy would be dependent upon Democratic control of the White House, but the suggestion that federal prosecutors could charge people with crimes seems like a stretch. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
Supreme Court struck down Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act— and the laws of 15 other states that still prohibited marriage between white people and people of other “races” — as unconstitutional and “obviously an endorsement of the doctrine of White Supremacy. [read post]