Search for: "People v. White (1986)" Results 81 - 100 of 240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Padmapper ordered data geographically to help people find apartments. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:09 am by PaulKostro
City of Philadelphia, 812 F.2d 105, 117 & n.8 (3d Cir. 1987); White v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
White, 7 F.3d 527, 528-29 (6th Cir. 1993). [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 3:43 am by SHG
As we made clear in Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v)… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v)… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm by Mark Walsh
Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Batson v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:02 pm
Hepps (1986) (generally rejecting the view that the burden of proving truth can be placed on the defendant); R.A.V. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Whether to preserve, reverse, or modify the circuit law created by Kellerthus merits this Court’s en banc attention — especially since this Court is the “Court of Appeals for the Hollywood Circuit,” White v. [read post]