Search for: "People v. Whitehead" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2010, 7:44 am
" is the question raised by Brian Whitehead and Richard Kempner (Kempner & Partners LLP) in a current intelligence note for the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, published ahead of time here on the jiplp weblog: this piece reviews the ruling in Schütz (UK) Limited v Werit UK Limited, Protechna SA [2010] EWHC 660 (Pat) there is no free-standing right to repair a patented product in UK patent law. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am by Reference Staff
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Sulfur – helps break down blackheads and whiteheads. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 4:12 pm by Rick Hills
SCOTUS seems to rely exclusively on the idea of lenity, as in Weyhrauch v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:19 pm
 The other papers in this section are real dynamite and include William Birdthistle on Jones v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Banks v. [read post]