Search for: "People v. Widener" Results 221 - 240 of 324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm by My name
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:21 am by Carlos A. Kelly
It came from California… Many people are familiar with the use of eminent domain to acquire private property for public use, such as the widening of a public road. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:15 am by Andres
Analysis Football DataCo v Yahoo! [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:00 pm by Curt Cutting
Last year we blogged about the documentary "Hot Coffee," which focuses on Liebeck v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:18 am by Michael O'Hear
The Lopez “revolution” finally petered out with the Court’s 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
To the increasingly vocal and active privacy lobby on both sides of the Atlantic, the most significant opinion is probably that of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who would, it seems, widen the ambit of protection offered by the Fourth Amendment: she questioned the aggregation and use of data on the details of individuals’ lives by the executive and went further still, to suggest that third parties could also be subject to constraints in their use and disclosure of such information:… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm by Colin Murray
Last year’s Court of Human Rights judgment in Ponomaryov v Bulgaria did affirm (at [56]) that the right did not necessarily have the same effect at all levels of education and that, “at the University level, which so far remains optional for many people, higher fees for aliens – and indeed fees in general – seem to be commonplace and can, in the present circumstances, be considered fully justified. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
While not without its critics (read here Widener Law Professor Ann Conaway's commentary), the core of Chancellor Strine's opinion last month in Auriga Capital v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:53 am by Staci Zaretsky
Folks coming into law school now have much better information than people who enrolled a few years ago, but people are continuing to enroll based on misleading information, and they continue to have massive debt. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:59 am by Susan Brenner
Since this is standard language, to give it scope-widening powers would undo the c [read post]