Search for: "People v. Williams" Results 41 - 60 of 3,807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
” Kohn and Sanjour battled the EPA for four years, and on May 30, 1995, in a case that impacted every government employee, the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, in William Sanjour et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
  The final reading was an excellent new book, MAKING A NEW AMERICAN CONSTITUTION, by George William Van Cleve, currently a visiting scholar at Georgetown and the author of previous excellent books on American constitutional history. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Talmage, William Robinson, and Eugene Cook,[8]relied on sincere religious beliefs in opposing the CRA and interracial marriage.[9] In addition to members of the clergy, the religious beliefs against the mixing of the races were “deeply held by many people. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:46 pm by fvanloon
“In plain English, the University of Michigan appears to have created ‘whites-only’ and ‘non-whites-only’ events, in a manner reminiscent of the doctrine of racial segregation overturned by Brown v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:50 am by Irene
” In the “whites-only” meeting RAs received materials that listed “common racist behaviors and attitudes of white people. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:20 am by Lawrence Lessig, Jason Harrow
The legal theory that would allow state legislatures to go rogue and appoint electors without regard for the popular vote rests on an argument made by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:37 pm by fvanloon
Embassy in Kyiv mentioning Burisma (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:53 am by Nathan Dorn
London: Bradbury and Evans, 1854-1872, 25 v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
But the Court itself issued no ruling.More than a century later, the Court entered the fray in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Gore litigation—Chief Justice William Rehnquist joined by Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas—that is the modern font of this notion that elected state legislatures are protected from interference by other state bodies with regard to regulation of federal elections. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am by Connor Clerkin, Lane Corrigan
Under the Constitution, according to Gorsuch, judges cannot “improvise with their own election rules in place of those the people’s representatives have adopted. [read post]