Search for: "People v. Williams (1988)" Results 201 - 220 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear two years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm by Amy Howe
Along with Justice Byron White, Kennedy also joined a separate opinion, written by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, that would have effectively dismantled the test outlined in Roe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the space below, I discuss another effort, albeit this time via the judiciary rather than the legislature, to prevent the people from formally weighing in on another hot-button issue: campaign finance reform. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:29 am
British Horseracing Board v William Hill). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]