Search for: "People v. Wills" Results 101 - 120 of 5,635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 2:53 pm
The Court of Appeal, partially reversed, based upon its interpretation of the relevant statute.The California Supreme Court then granted review.Now, in that tribunal, we're not willing to simply let one side argue the case without someone representing the contrary position. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 11:46 pm
(2) Don't put anything -- anything -- on your laptop (letters to your spouse, financial data, attorney-client communications, etc.) that you bring back to the U.S. that you're not totally willing to give the government free rein to examine. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 3:16 pm
 Perhaps because you had a guy who told his former fiancee that he was willing to still have sex with her only if she agreed not to tell anyone they were still doing so, and she agreed. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:06 pm
  He's confined to a wheelchair, has to wear a permanent hard cervical collar on his neck (given the cancer all in his spine), and his sister's willing to take care of him at her home in hospice care until he dies. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am by INFORRM
The court reviewed certain authorities that have grappled with this problem, including: McKennit v Ash [2005] EWHC 3003 (see [81]); Rocknroll v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWHC 24 (see [21] and [25]); and Mosley v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 687, where Eady J observed: “Nevertheless, a point may be reached where the information sought to be restricted, by order of the Court is so widely and generally accessible ‘in the public… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:54 am
  But I'm willing to defend it because the underlying principle is a valid one.Then there's this case.It's not that I don't understand where Justice Dawson is coming from. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:57 am
 When the court reconvened, the following proceedings occurred: “THE COURT: Recalling People vs. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
And as to which I'm more than willing to shed some paragraphs of virtual ink. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 11:56 am
"  At which point the defendant relented, and said he still wanted the plea and was willing to accept the conditions.Well then. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
 Linguistically, even.And yet.There's a part of me that's not willing to go that far. [read post]