Search for: "People v. Winters"
Results 21 - 40
of 798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 3:55 pm
Court of Appeals Second Circuit’s rehearing of Arar v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:38 pm
Latest Analyis: Scalia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:00 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:38 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Willis v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 5:04 am
Reviczky v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:40 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:51 pm
Maybe the owner just really likes a warm car in the winter (unlikely to be necessary down here in Southern California, but possible). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
Dagenhart, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
The court's opinion in that case, Cook v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:58 am
Valent v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:05 am
Erasmus v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 3:50 pm
Prior to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Papadopoulos v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
The latest issue of the ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal (Vol. 33, no. 1, Winter 2018) is out. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 3:12 pm
Bell, Wickard v. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 7:53 am
Here is the abstract: As headlines over the last decade have made clear, people in the United States can no longer afford to take fresh water for granted. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:28 am
Additional Resources: Budzko v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:12 pm
In the People v Crosby the defendant with an attorney gave a confession which tarnished his chances of an acquittal. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 7:31 pm
Under these circumstances, when the time period charged, namely seven months, approaches the nine-month period found to be per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp (74 NY2d 639; see People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 538), the People are subjected to "proportionally heightened scrutiny" as to whether their inability to provide more precise times is justified (id at 539). [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 3:30 am
David V. [read post]
