Search for: "People v. Woods" Results 361 - 380 of 1,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” A new episode of the National Constitution Center’s We the People podcast focuses on Seila Law v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am by Marty Lederman
As I noted in my earlier post, this emphasis on the individual plaintiffs' role as company decision-makers makes sense, in light of how most people would treat analogous questions of moral culpability in other corporate contexts. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:55 pm by Joy Waltemath
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31, November 5, 2019, Wood, D.). [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Last up is Woods v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The speech focuses on the international role of the ICO, convergence issues and people centric approaches to data. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am by Eric Turkewitz
In addition to trying to keep the civil suits at bay, we tracked the grand jury investigation of Woods closely for more than a year – interviewing each of the many people brought before the grand jury – before Woods became unable to afford the representation. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Alito Jr. would have the Court’s opinion in Harris v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Woods, No. 07-51491 In an appeal of a sentence for distributing crack cocaine, imposition of a supervised-release condition forbidding defendant from residing with any person to whom she was not ceremonially married or related by blood is vacated where the condition was overbroad and involved a greater deprivation of liberty than was reasonably necessary to achieve sentencing purposes. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:24 am
Subscription Required BRONX COUNTY Criminal Practice Court Finds Defendant's Nervousness, Broken English Insufficient to Provide Basis to Search Car People v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Even a perceptive journalist like Zoe Williams was confused, not able to see the wood for the trees in such a long judgment. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
The detailed recommendation from Magistrate Judge Sarah Cave (which District Judge Gregory Woods will now consider) came in Flynn v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Clear labelling of incentivised posts is required under UK consumer protection law, so that people are not misled. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am by Raffaela Wakeman
A bomb went off in Katmandu, Nepal, killing at least three people. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]