Search for: "People v. Wright (1990)" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  In the 1990s, the swing was in favor of too much protection—Harper & Row v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
It is apparent from epidemiological data that some people can engage in chain smoking for many decades without developing lung cancer. [read post]
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958-9 (3d Cir. 1990) (if New Jersey law requires plaintiffs to show that it is more likely than not that Bendectin caused the injury, and if plaintiffs rely solely on epidemiological analysis in order to avoid summary judgment, the relative risk from the epidemiological data relied upon will, at a minimum, have to exceed 2) Daubert v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Deukmejian, a 1990 ruling and the most instance in which the court held a measure to be a revision. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Erin Molan and Nyadol Nyuon have said it would be “almost impossible” to uptake and not “useful” to most people in Australia due to the cost and effort involved, the Guardian reports. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 2:36 pm by Amy Howe
The reservation rule Enacted in 1990, the ADA prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities by businesses that serve the public. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:41 am
After much national and international uproar at these blatant violations of human rights, the Supreme Court finally ruled five to three in Hamdan v. [read post]
The Purpose of Early State RFRAs and What It Tells Us About the Recent Legislative Efforts As we discussed in Part One, the Supreme Court, in 1990, decided the case of Employment Division v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The jury system as understood in America seems to me as direct and extreme a consequence of the dogma of the sovereignty of the people as universal suffrage. [read post]