Search for: "People v. Young" Results 41 - 60 of 4,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2011, 3:34 am
" It is, of course, a matter that could have a serious bearing for many people, so it is not just the parties who are anxiously awaiting this decision. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm by Gaetan Gerville-Reache
On July 31, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued a 4-3 opinion in People v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:41 am
He also helped people in need, such as by loading grocery bags into cars for people at the store and helping his blind grandfather do laundry. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:39 pm
" I guess in Justice Young's world since only 6 people were at risk of electrocution and only one guy actually got electrocuted its no big deal. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:39 pm by Serafini, Michalowski, Derkacz
" I guess in Justice Young's world since only 6 people were at risk of electrocution and only one guy actually got electrocuted its no big deal. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am by David DePaolo
Everyone's a victim...Whether DSM-V may or may not have an impact directly on workers' compensation systems is irrelevant - DSM-V makes more people ill when they were previously considered to be normally functioning.We don't need more ill people in this country. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:18 pm
You can charge older people more for goods and services than young people because the former have more money than the latter.So holds the Court of Appeal.I'm sure that the fancy-schmancy "luxury health" fitness club in the Bay Area here decided to charge 18 to 29 year-olds a (much) lower monthly fee than its older patrons because they were concerned that single people in their 20s in the Bay Area had much lower disposable income than their regular… [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 5:15 pm by William Weinberg
The murder charge this woman faces is called a “Watson murder,” so named following a California Supreme Court decision in 1981 (People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 8:12 pm
Plaintiffs Michael Pottinger, Peter Carter, Berry Young Defendant City of Miami Plaintiffs' Claim That the city of Miami had a policy of harassing homeless people and routinely seized and destroyed their property in violation of their constitutional rights. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Background The Supreme Court has upheld a challenge to the “named person” provisions of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 3:16 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:32 pm
The Court held that"The threshold issue in evaluating whether a resentence is vindictive is whether the resentence is more severe than that originally imposed" (People v Cahill, 46 AD3d 1455, 1456; see generally People v Young, 94 NY2d 171, 176-177, rearg denied 94 NY2d 876; People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 159-160), and a determinate sentence of 25 years is of course more severe than one of 20 years. [read post]