Search for: "Peoples Drug Stores v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2019, 10:36 am by Bill Marler
As of April 22, 2019, a total of 358 people infected with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Reading were reported from 42 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:31 am by Jennifer Granick
In Knotts, officers used a beeper to help them figure out whether they were getting closer to or farther away from a can of drug precursor chemicals stored in a car. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,”  “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am by Susan Landau
District Court for the District of Columbia barring the bulk collection, the government immediately appealed to the court of appeals for a stay, which was granted. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia:  Destefano v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 6:50 am by Candess Zona-Mendola
These multiple cases have been reported in seven separate states, as well as in the District of Columbia, leading to such a substantial catastrophe that warranted the attention of both the FDA and CDC. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Davis, No. 06-5883, 06-6235 A conviction for drug-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) denial of his motion to suppress drugs found during his arrests; 2) denial of his motion to exclude two expert witnesses at his trial; 3) denial of his motion for a mistrial based on prosecutorial misconduct; and 4) three statements which allegedly constituted prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:13 pm
Since then, lower federal courts have decided more than 80 cases interpreting the decision, District of Columbia v. [read post]