Search for: "Peoples Drug Stores v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2019, 10:36 am
As of April 22, 2019, a total of 358 people infected with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Reading were reported from 42 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in Casias v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
Researching the drug’s safety with safeguards and later removing them is a common practice, like moving prescription drugs to over the counter after data on how the drug and its availability affect people. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
Researching the drug’s safety with safeguards and later removing them is a common practice, like moving prescription drugs to over the counter after data on how the drug and its availability affect people. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
That number represents a 44% drop since the Miller decision.The Sentencing Project also notes that “thirty-one states and the District of Columbia do not have any prisoners serving life without parole for crimes committed as juveniles…. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
Yesterday the Tenth Circuit heard oral arguments in Bonidy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:17 am
Consider for example in Casias v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
With this neighborhood safety zone plan, the District of Columbia will already be a police state. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 4:00 pm
It simply failed to comply with the terms of the warrant – that a device be installed in the District of Columbia within 10 days, leading the government to argue that it wasn’t legally required to obtain one. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Hobby Lobby Stores Bush v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:48 am
” District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,” “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low… [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia barring the bulk collection, the government immediately appealed to the court of appeals for a stay, which was granted. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia: Destefano v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Davis, No. 06-5883, 06-6235 A conviction for drug-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) denial of his motion to suppress drugs found during his arrests; 2) denial of his motion to exclude two expert witnesses at his trial; 3) denial of his motion for a mistrial based on prosecutorial misconduct; and 4) three statements which allegedly constituted prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:13 pm
Since then, lower federal courts have decided more than 80 cases interpreting the decision, District of Columbia v. [read post]
