Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 49,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Peck and constitutional development in the Early United States. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am by Grace Capel
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix
The Supreme Court in R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57 held by a 3:2 majority that the blanket requirement that all applicants for a student loan have “indefinite leave to remain” is discriminatory and must be amended by the Government. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant denied drinking alcohol to the police officer but stated that the passengers were drinking. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:58 am by SHG
On June 26, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:19 pm
 But grabs two out-of-state cases to say that it should count as battery. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm by Richard L. Duquette
  You can peruse the respondants brief below, wherein they agreed with Wooley on appeal - which should result in a reversal of the conviction.IN THESUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIACOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, APPELLATE DIVISIONTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,Plaintiff/Respondent,v.ANDREW WOOLLEY, Defendant/Appellant. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People stated that the unchallenged abstract showed that the defendant was aware that his license was suspended three days prior. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am by Frank Pasquale
[Abigail] Moncrieff’s brief argues the petitioner’s interpretation of the statute would render the statute unconstitutional under two principles of federalism: that Congress can't coerce states into implementing federal programs, and that all states must be treated equally.As Koppelman notes below, the same states' rights ideas at the core of the conservative win in NFIB v. [read post]