Search for: "Peoples v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 44,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm
The People stated that the unchallenged abstract showed that the defendant was aware that his license was suspended three days prior. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:19 pm
But grabs two out-of-state cases to say that it should count as battery. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:28 pm
You can peruse the respondants brief below, wherein they agreed with Wooley on appeal - which should result in a reversal of the conviction.IN THESUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIACOUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, APPELLATE DIVISIONTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,Plaintiff/Respondent,v.ANDREW WOOLLEY, Defendant/Appellant. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 12:32 pm
People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
Given the demographic distribution of income and wealth in the United States, that means tax cases are mostly about rich White people. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:22 am
In the case of Shehla Zia v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 4:51 pm
People v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 12:15 pm
The post Skilling V. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:18 am
State v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
The post Protecting People from Their Own Religious Communities: Jane Doe in Church and State appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:49 pm
The Court of Appeal says: "[I]n this case, the People have made no attempt to show that section 2076 directly and materially advances the state’s substantial interests. . . . [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am
[Abigail] Moncrieff’s brief argues the petitioner’s interpretation of the statute would render the statute unconstitutional under two principles of federalism: that Congress can't coerce states into implementing federal programs, and that all states must be treated equally.As Koppelman notes below, the same states' rights ideas at the core of the conservative win in NFIB v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 12:21 pm
People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm
Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 3:33 pm
Washington State's case challenging President Trump's executive order banning travel by people from seven predominantly Muslim countries is moving fast. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
The Facts of State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:44 pm
This is incorrect.First, there is language in Chiafalo v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
(See Miranda v. [read post]
