Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 49,838
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Anderson and the Ohio deadline law involve), or how votes are counted and used to allocate electors (at issue in Nebraska), variations among states guarantee that voters in some states are not treated the same way as are voters in others states, even though who is elected President affects people in each and every state. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Jeffrey J. Spina-Jennings
According to the Regulations, the determination is based on whether the organization is being operated for the “common good and general welfare of the people of the community” or “for the purposes of bringing about civic betterments and social improvements. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
That is a lesson from John Courtney Murray.Murray died in 1967, before Pope Paul VI issued his famous letter against contraception and the Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:01 pm
Yes, the statute says that you can remove, even from your home state in a diversity case, if the defendant who resides in that state is not yet served. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am by Mark Ashton
Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Corina Heri
Switzerland case concerned a group of older Swiss women; the territorially and substantively ambitious Duarte Agostinho v. 32 Member States was brought by six Portuguese children and young people; and Carême v. [read post]