Search for: "Peoples v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 44,762
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 3:17 pm
Defendant argues applicable law requires proof that defendant moved to a new address in California, not to an address out of state. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:51 pm
(People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:05 pm
So the trial court enters an order committing him to Patton State Hospital.So far, everything's normal. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 10:00 am
How long it may last depends upon the laws of your state. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:12 pm
So the State files the appropriate charges. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
The Supreme Court of the United States released their opinion on Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 5:13 am
In Arista v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am
As an adult, he was frequently called Ke Ali‘i Maka‘āinana (Prince of the People), for the services he gave to the Hawaiian people. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:54 am
Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:07 pm
At least for the state. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 4:40 pm
The state wants a retrial on a strike, but there's no need to waste money doing so, since the net result (even if the state was successful on remand) would be to add a single day to the guy's already-existing 39 year sentence.Makes sense to me. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 12:12 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 12:12 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:42 am
In State of Nevada v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 3:21 pm
But -- at least currently -- double jeopardy doesn't bar California (or other states) from charging them with state crimes as well.Many of the existing defendants have recently been charged with additional counts of money laundering -- an offense that carries substantially additional jail time. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:49 pm
State of Utah v Gomez concerns a search and seizure case where the defendant was found guilty of possessing a variety of illegal drugs. [read post]
