Search for: "Peoples v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 48,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2014, 8:15 pm
Columnist George Will cites the Cato Institute amicus brief in Harris v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:33 pm
King (7th Cir. 2003) 349 F.3d 964 (King) and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Migrants' marriage rule bias is disproportionate Regina (Baiai and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme requiring permission by the Home Office for marriage by people subject to immigration control or those who had entered the UK illegally contravened articles 12 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing the right to marry and prohibiting discrimination for nationality or religion. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:46 am
Peake, et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:02 am
Why do people look to the mental states of person rather than the outcomes the person produces? [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:13 am
Harris v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:17 am
REDUCED to Misdemeanor DUI – Vehicular Aggravated Assault, State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm
Missouri v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:48 am
Our Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
The exhibit serves as a visual accompaniment to the 38th annual Edward V. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
R (Baiai and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2); R (Bigoku and another) v Same; R (Tilki) v Same (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 53; [2008] WLR (D) 272 “The statutory scheme requiring the Secretary of State's permission for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right… [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 12:39 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
In People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
But the United States Supreme Court disagreed in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, and United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
