Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 47,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Migrants' marriage rule bias is disproportionate Regina (Baiai and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme requiring permission by the Home Office for marriage by people subject to immigration control or those who had entered the UK illegally contravened articles 12 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing the right to marry and prohibiting discrimination for nationality or religion. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:02 am
Why do people look to the mental states of person rather than the outcomes the person produces? [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:17 am by Staff
REDUCED to Misdemeanor DUI – Vehicular Aggravated Assault, State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix.
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
 The exhibit serves as a visual accompaniment to the 38th annual Edward V. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
R (Baiai and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2); R (Bigoku and another) v Same; R (Tilki) v Same (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 53; [2008] WLR (D) 272 “The statutory scheme requiring the Secretary of State's permission for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right… [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]