Search for: "Peoples v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 50,478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
The problem, perhaps with isolated exception, is generally not the people. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 9:28 am by Seth Davis
Circuit published an interesting standing opinion last week: Citizens for Constitutional Integrity v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am by Norman L. Eisen
Georgia State Election Board Rule Challenge (Abhiraman, et al., v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 10:49 pm by Josh Blackman
"] Last week I wrote about the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 8:03 am by Eugene Volokh
At the training, Lumley stated that she did not believe that all white people were racist, and that people of other races could be racist. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am by INFORRM
The ICO has issued a reprimand to the Labour Party for repeatedly failing to respond to people who asked what personal information the party held on them – known as a subject access request. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:07 am by Marty Lederman
(The United States is not a State Party to the treaty, but most European nations are, including the UK, France, and Germany.) [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was… [read post]