Search for: "Pepe v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
With this Kat’s feed being flooded with the news of the ruling in “Pecorino Romano” v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:06 pm
P.D.V-G., Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
And another potential candidate: moral rights/no econ interest: Pepe the Frog v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
” Fanworks provide incredible benefits in literacy, sexuality education, language learning, community building, and other good things that come from making something you love and sharing it with other people who might just love it too.On the content v. tech distinction that Maria Strong made: we consider ourselves content folks who use tech. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:36 am
” A.J.B. cites to United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
–UMG v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm
This topic is of particular importance to this writer as he is regularly finding himself explaining this sorry state of affairs to up and coming game developers. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:52 pm
In Pepe v Pepe, 258 N.J. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
In Pepe v Pepe, 258 N.J. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 11:47 pm
Symmons, First Reactions to the Philippines v China Arbitration Award Concerning the Supposed Historic Claims of China in the South China Sea Keyuan Zou, Historic Rights in the South China Sea Arbitration Case Lorenzo Schiano di Pepe, Arbitral Tribunal Constituted under Annex VII of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Permanent Court of Arbitration Case No. 2015–28, The Italian Republic v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:55 am
Contents include: ArticlesTommy Koh & Hao Duy Phan, The Asian Way to Settle Disputes Ian Townsend-Gault, Sustainable and Sound: First Principles for Addressing Maritime Jurisdictional Issues and Disputes Clive Schofield & Richard Schofield, Testing the Waters: Charting The Evolution of Claims to and From Low-Tide Elevations and Artificial Islands under the Law of the Sea Genevieve Quirk & Quentin Hanich, Ocean Diplomacy: The Pacific Island Countries’ Campaign to the UN for an… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:30 am
He is, in this instance, a state actor. [read post]
