Search for: "Pepper v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am by Florian Mueller
Approximately 18 hours ago, a clerk's notice already mentioned the possibility of Epic Games' antitrust action against Apple over its App Store terms and policies being reassigned to Oakland-based United States District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:37 am by Jim Singer
The United States Supreme Court has accepted for review a new patent case that will determine what burden of proof is required to challenging a patent’s validity in court. [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm by Eric Caligiuri
PEPPER ET AL., case number 17-204, the United States Supreme Court considered a case alleging Apple has monopolized the retail market for the sale of apps and has unlawfully used its monopolistic power to charge consumers higher-than competitive prices. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 1:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Carpenter v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 3:20 am by Anna Christensen
United States (09-6822) [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:11 pm by Florian Mueller
Pepper decision on consumer standing in an App Store antitrust case as well as a 2013 decision according to which patent-related agreements can be evaluated under antitrust law (FTC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 8:54 am by J. Ross Pepper
Lancer Insurance Company, United States District Court of the Middle District of Tennessee, no. 3:15-CV-01491. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 3:02 am
United States Bureau of Prisons, (8th Cir., Feb. 4, 2008), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a Muslim inmate's free exercise, RFRA and RLUIPA claims. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:05 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm this year) may even find it highly dissuasive.Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over the Epic Games v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 7:03 am by Steven Cohen
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Northern District of California – November 2nd. 2018) involves a putative class action alleging that the defendant misleads consumers by labeling its ginger ale as containing “real ginger” but that there is allegedly no actual ginger in the soda. [read post]