Search for: "Pereira v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2007, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:24 am
The justices hold that the ALJs ARE "officers of the United States" for purposes of the Appointments Clause.AND: Another case is Pereira v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:54 pm
Pereira, 53 M.J. 183 (C.A.A.F. 2000); United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:12 am
Johnson, 654 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
Third, the Supreme Court decided an immigration case called Pereira v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:03 am
United States, No. 17-530. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
"Accordingly Pereira was able to successfully claim that he had been "physically present" in the United States for more than ten years.The same theory is applied in New York State cases involving "proper service" of a notice of discipline in DiPillo v Jacknis. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:03 am
SEC (Monday, April 23) Pereira v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Statute of Frauds The question arose in the English case of J Pereira Fernandes SA v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
And in Pereira v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:35 am
Wayfair, and Pereira v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm
§1101(a)(3) (defining "alien" to include "any person not a citizen or national of the United States") with §1101(a)(22) (defining "national of the United States"). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:22 pm
Enter Agusto Niz-Chavez, a Guatemalan national who fled violence in his home country and arrived in the United States in 2005. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 2:41 pm
" United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
United States; Bens v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
In Barton, the Supreme Court is examining once again the stop-time rule – the same provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act that the justices dissected in Pereira v. [read post]
