Search for: "Perez v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2017, 4:18 pm by John Ellis
United States Department of Labor, et al., Case # 4:16-cv-00731-ALM, which was consolidated with Plano Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:54 am by NCC Staff
Ltd. , and it will feature attorneys representing the United States and Chinese governments. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
 The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:42 pm
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Amicus brief of the Maritime Law Association of the United States (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the American Institute of Marine Underwriters (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-1092 Case name: Perez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:56 am by Joy Waltemath
The Washington Alliance of Technical Workers is a union that represents STEM workers throughout the United States’ labor market. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States by an equally divided court, with Justice Anthony Kennedy recused, for this blog. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:57 am
Citing the Court of Appeals ruling in Wiggins v Board of Education, 60 NY2d 385, the Appellate Division said that because there was no written designation appointing the hearing officer, the appointing authority “lacked jurisdiction” to maintain the initial disciplinary proceeding against Perez. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 6:46 am by William D Wilson
  That rule was once again revisited by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
And so the Fifth Circuit struck the GFSZA down.The Fifth Circuit’s opinion was subsequently vindicated by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice 18 USC §3509(m) Constitutional; Defense Counsel Can Examine Computer Drive at Government Office United States v. [read post]