Search for: "Perez v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
”  United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an ineffective assistance of counsel case in which the lower court held that the defendant could not prove that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s erroneous advice to plead guilty, which resulted in mandatory deportation, because the evidence of his guilt was overwhelming, noting that at “issue is not just Lee’s fate, but also the Court’s view of the state of plea bargaining in this country. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
The Court of Appeals decision relied substantially on section 602(a) of the Copyright Code which deals with infringing importation of copies and the case of BMG Music v Perez (1991) where BMG Music was able to prohibit a reseller's business. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 1:41 pm
Wise presents an unusually interesting issue: "Whether Appellant's confinement conditions, including and in particular with respect to his claim of having been confined with Enemy Prisoners of War in Iraq, were unlawful, and whether, in the context presented, Appellant forfeited his claims of unlawful post-trial confinement by failing to exhaust his administrative remedies under United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States (District Court docket 11-1303). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:40 am by Kedar Bhatia
This year, however, the Court has released 21, including blockbusters United States v. [read post]