Search for: "Perez v. United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 714
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2008, 2:35 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:42 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:23 pm
For the reasons set forth in my opinion concurring in the judgment in Perez v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:14 pm
., dissenting), Perez, et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:15 am
United States, the Trump administration’s position would mark the end of privacy in the digital age. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 18-5838, Perez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
See Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
At that point, Soto-Perez called the Crimes Against Children Unit (CACU) and Det. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
United States Issue: Whether the holding in Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am
” At Federal Regulations Advisor, Leland Beck predicts that the Court will grant review in Perez v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 1:00 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Cocaine, Statements Not Suppressed; Car, Truck Subject to Search Warrant 'Automobile Exemption'
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 1:18 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Ponzi Scheme's Alleged Perpetrator Avoids Jail; Magistrate Judge Tightens Bail Conditions
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:58 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO JUSTIFY… [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 7:47 am
It has decided every case it heard in November except for United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:26 am
The state points to the two earlier versions of the order, which targeted Muslim countries, as well as comments and tweets made by the president calling for a ban on the entry of Muslims into the United States. [read post]
