Search for: "Perez v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2012, 11:02 am by Jeff Gamso
The country that has taken the place of the United States of America is a completely lawless country. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
Meanwhile the annual IP Publishers and Editors lunch on 7 December, also in London (click here and scroll down for details) has gone one better, with 44 participants signed up from as far afield as the United States and Germany. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Copus pointed out that this issue has been raised in a case, UPMC Braddock v Perez, currently pending before the D.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:07 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Maldonado v DiBre, 140 AD3d 1501 [3d Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 908 [2016] [“even if, as plaintiffs claim, the loss of the units was not voluntary, they still would not have standing to pursue derivative claims”]). [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Keisler, No. 06-60644"Pakistani native's petition for review of a denial of his application for cancellation of removal from the United States is denied as misuse of a social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 408(a)(7)(A) falls within the definition a crime involving moral turpitude, for purposes of ineligibility for a grant of cancellation of removal. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
There is an abundant historical record supporting the conclusion that the United States Constitution was promoted by a core group of political leaders in order to strengthen the national government, and that the Constitution was understood by the people during the ratification debate to do just that. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Determining that the DOL presented sufficient evidence of adverse employment actions taken against the employee, the court denied the employer’s motion for summary judgment (Perez v U.S. [read post]