Search for: "Perez v. United States" Results 501 - 520 of 714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm by Unknown
”) Normally does not mean always.[1] See Normally, Cambridge Dictionary (2019), https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dict ionary/english/normally (defining “normally” as “usually or regularly” and “usually, or in most cases” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
Cir. 2005)).Preliminarily, the Board found that the doctrine of foreign equivalents may apply, since “more than 1.3 million people in the United States speak French at home. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
United States Postal Service, [985 F.2d 440, 442 (8th Cir. 1993)]; Kreppein v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 10:27 am by Susan I. Nelson
Susan Nelson said she represents a handful of teens and 20-somethings who should gain clearance to legally live and work in the United States under the terms of the policy change. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
” Here, “by committing an ever-increasing amount of State funds to paying State employee salaries or overtime,” the federal executive “can unilaterally deplete State resources, forcing the States to adopt or acquiesce to federal policies, instead of implementing State policies and priorities. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 11:30 am by Susan Brenner
Romero-Lopez, supra (quoting Int’l Union, United Mine Workers v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
On Thursday, a Second Circuit panel declined to resolve this issue in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the January 13, January 19 and February 17 conferences)   Perez v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:51 am by Daniel J. Guttman
Some cases set no reasonable expectation of privacy for material posted on the public internet, United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
Work may be considered as ongoing during a short lapse of time necessary to conduct tests designed to assure proper performance where such testing is an essential element of the work by the insured (see Perez v New York City Hous. [read post]