Search for: "Perry v. Perry" Results 41 - 60 of 3,329
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2008, 7:49 am
Harris v Perry and Another Court of Appeal “A judge imposed an unreasonably high standard of care in holding that children playing on a bouncy castle hired by parents for a children's party required uninterrupted supervision. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:42 am by Beth Graham
  Perry Homes appealed the judgment to the Supreme Court of Texas in Perry Homes, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:46 pm by Reproductive Rights
Rick Perry categorized abortion as a states’ rights issue today, saying that if Roe v.... [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:07 am by Lawrence Solum
Adam Perry (University of Oxford - Faculty of Law) has posted Wednesbury Unreasonableness on SSRN. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:27 am by constitutional lawblogger
Debuting on line today is volume 37:1 of the NYU Review of Law & Social Change, a symposium issue dedicated to Perry v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:27 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In 2001, just months after Perry's ascension to Governor, the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion for new trial — Newly discovered evidence Lionel Perry (“Appellant”) filed a motion for a new trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City after a jury convicted him of reckless endangerment. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:37 am
07/02/09 LawDork:Attorney Chris Geidner has this to say on today's hearing in Perry v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 11:25 am by constitutional lawblogger
Steve Sanders has posted an interesting commentary on the amicus brief filed by thirteen states in Perry v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Perry himself called Acting Deputy Attorney General Donoghue on Dec. 27. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:48 am by traceydennis
Regina v White; Regina v Dennard; Regina v Perry; Regina v Rowbotham [2010] EWCA Crim 978; [2010] WLR (D) 120 “For the purposes of tobacco smuggling cases there was unlikely to be any incompatibility between the rules which made those liable under the Excise Goods (Holding, Movement, Warehousing and REDS) Regulations 1992 or the Tobacco Products Regulations 2001 to pay duty and those made liable by Council Directive 92/12/EEC. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:35 am
Harris v Perry and another [2008] EWCA Civ 907; [2008] WLR (D) 278 “It was not reasonably foreseeable that boisterous play on a bouncy castle would involve a significant risk of serious harm and, therefore, parents who hired a bouncy castle for a children's party did not have a duty of care to keep the children playing on it under uninterrupted supervision. [read post]