Search for: "Perry v. Superior Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 5:45 am
They were some of the same arguments resoundingly rejected by a number of courts examining the various justifications for the same-sex marriage prohibitions — most notably the Goodridge decision in Massachusetts and California Federal District Court Judge Vaughn Walker’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
I’m assuming he meant the FDIC, but what do I know, that’s what the court documents said, the FTC. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Superior Essex Inc. et al. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 2:14 pm
(See the cases cited in Joe's comment below.)So the couples might go to the local Superior Court for that County. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
In the Perry v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:31 pm
Brown v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:34 pm
In the Northern District of California Federal Court, the case of Perry, et al., v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm
As you, the reader of a legal blog, undoubtedly know, earlier today Judge Walker released his opinion in Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
Indeed the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same sex couples.'By those words and many others contained in the 138-page ruling in Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:15 pm
NEWS: Perry et al v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm
Cal.) issued his ruling in Perry v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:21 pm
Perry filed suit in superior court alleging seven claims. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:00 am
The oldest one is from the Ontario Court of Appeal, McKay v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Wash. 2009); Perry v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
” Because the majority concluded that the lower court acted in haste, and neglected federal law, and because the Court is not subject to Federal Judicial Conference rules, the Court’s decision blocking broadcasts in Perry v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 8:13 am
Superior Court (1995) 31 Cal.App.4th 573, 583-84.) [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:03 pm
Allen does cite Scheanette v. [read post]
