Search for: "Perry v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 1,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm by Ed. Puerto Rico
También vienen a la mente documentales como The Garden, Gideon’s Army y Whitey: United States of America v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am by Rick Esenberg
In League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 10:33 am by Amy Howe
On October 3, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost weighs in on Packingham v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:56 am by Scott Bomboy
In 2014, a United States District Court in New Mexico sided with the Wiccans and the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented them. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
The first decision was in Perry v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Tough questions greeted counsel for both sides of this case—a seemingly mundane dispute about playgrounds and tire scraps that has potentially wide-ranging implications for the contours of religious liberty in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
United States, one of the court’s many immigration cases this term. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Mesa: In this case, the justices will decide what standard courts should use to determine whether the Fourth Amendment applies outside the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 5:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the account’s “bio” line, Trump identifies himself as the “45th President of the United States of America. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  Since colonial times, anti-miscegenation laws had existed in British North America and, after the Revolutionary War, in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
  The United States Supreme Court granted cert this week in Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Commonwealth, supra.The Court of Appeals then began its analysis of the substantive legal issues in the case, explaining that`[i]n Kentucky, the right to an impartial jury is protected by Section 11 of the Kentucky Constitution, as well as the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the [United States] Constitution. [read post]