Search for: "Person v. Floyd"
Results 1 - 20
of 513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2008, 5:12 pm
This post started as a response to a detailed comment by David Giles, Counsel for Floyd in S V Floyd, on my case report. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:12 pm
This post started as a response to a detailed comment by David Giles, Counsel for Floyd in S V Floyd, on my case report. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:50 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:06 am
There is no principled reason why a person (or entity) who wishes to contribute $1 million dollars to fund the public dialogue is any less deserving of the right to anonymity than the person who forks over $20. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 7:05 am
In an order dated January 11, Hennepin County District Court Judge Peter Cahill ruled that the first trial, State v. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:58 am
On February 1, the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in the precedential case of State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
Learn from Floyd. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
Floyd Alexander-Hunt is an LLM candidate at Queen Mary University London and a research assistant at K [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 7:01 am
Readers who were interested in my earlier post on the landlord whose disabled tenant appealed against a possession order obtained under s21, will be interested in this quote from the final paragraph in the report in the recent case of S -v- Floyd (with the Equality and Human Rights Commission joined in as an interested party):one of the members of this court has dealt recently with an application for permission to appeal from a judgment of a Circuit Judge (Bernstein v… [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
This type of control technique must be universally outlawed, especially when the person is handcuffed and therefore poses no serious danger to officers. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:37 am
Supreme Court, in Coy v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Welcome, Floyd. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 11:46 am
Bennett Capers (pictured right) has a terrific op-ed in The New York Times today about Floyd v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:51 am
Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 10:26 am
In Griffin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:55 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:40 am
Mishan (T/A Emson) v Hozelock & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 871 Since Arnold LJ’s elevation to the Court of Appeal in 2019, he and Floyd LJ have heard about 11 cases together, spanning a mixture of areas of law, some patents cases and some not. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:30 pm
In addition to reversing the lower court, Floyd also effectively overrules State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:30 pm
In addition to reversing the lower court, Floyd also effectively overrules State v. [read post]
