Search for: "Peru v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
Republic of Peru, docket number 11-1602, before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 7:30 am by Daily Record Staff
Three years later, when facing removal from the United States, ... [read post]
25 Nov 2006, 4:11 pm
The plaintiff delivered the fugitive into the hands of a foreign intelligence agency and then sued Peru in the United States for the award which Peru refused to pay, under theories of contract and tort. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Kathleen Claussen
If Peru does not do that, then the United States can raise the matter before a dispute settlement panel. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:12 am by Gilles Cuniberti
On December 14th, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed a suit seeking confirmation of an international arbitration award on the ground of forum non conveniens in Figueiredo Ferraz e Engenharia de Projeto Ltda. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 10:24 am by Rick St. Hilaire
An April 3, 2013 HSI news release recites, "In 1997, the United States and Peru entered into a bilateral agreement prohibiting the importation into the United States of specific cultural property originating from Peru, including artifacts and ethnological religious objects." [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The prosecutors allege, "The Defendant in rem is merchandise that has been introduced into the United States contrary to law, as it constitutes property unlawfully exported from Peru and stolen, smuggled or clandestinely imported or introduced into the United States." [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 6:11 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
"In March 2010, the United States government, on behalf of the government of Peru, filed a request for the extradition of David E. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  The Circuit invited the views of the United States, since “aspects of the appeal . . . might have implications for the conduct of the foreign relations of the United States”. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm by James P. Flynn
  That is because the TPP countries, including the United States, signed confidentiality agreements under which each promised to maintain the secrecy of the negotiations and the agreement’s specific terms. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm by James (Jim) P. Flynn
  That is because the TPP countries, including the United States, signed confidentiality agreements under which each promised to maintain the secrecy of the negotiations and the agreement’s specific terms. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:53 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Transnational Corporations in United Nations Law and Practice Michael Ioannidis, Naming a State – Disputing over Symbols of Statehood at the Example of “Macedonia” [read post]