Search for: "Peter Hirtle"
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2009, 4:28 am
(posted by Peter Hirtle; cross-posted from http://blog.librarylaw.com)Earlier this fall I wrote about what I called "the other coursepack case" (in Michigan, as opposed to the Georgia State case). [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 3:29 pm
(posted by Peter Hirtle)Lorcan Dempsey has an interesting blog posting about new publishing ventures in libraries. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:18 am
(Posted by Peter Hirtle. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 3:56 pm
(posted by Peter Hirtle)So Google, perhaps in response to Mary Minow's post, has issued a new privacy policy for Google Books. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:47 am
(Posted by Peter Hirtle) As the length of my posts suggests, James Grimmelmann put on a very thought-provoking symposium. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:46 am
(Posted by Peter Hirtle)The New York State Board of Regents met this week to discuss making permanent its proposed regulations on deaccessioning from museums and historical societies, and it punted. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:34 pm
(by Peter Hirtle) CLIR has inaugurated a new publication series called Ruminations, and for its first report, it has published an incredibly interesting and important report by John Wilkin. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:32 am
(by Peter Hirtle)On p. 195 of Copyright & Cultural Institutions (C&CI), I noted that “Court cases involving copyright infringement by cultural heritage institutions are rare. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:20 am
Posted by Peter Hirtle] Friday: L is for Lawsuit Kiran Raj (filling in for Michael Guzman), Cynthia Arato, and Jonathan Band opened the panels portion of the conference with what was for me (as a non-lawyer who has looked primarily at copyright) a tremendously useful introduction to the legal issues surrounding the settlement. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:44 am
Posted by Peter Hirtle] The afternoon sessions presented less that was entirely new to me and my note-taking skills started to flag, so the notes below have less on the actual presentations and more commentary from me. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 2:19 pm
(by Peter Hirtle) A little over two years ago, I wrote a post entitled " Free the Founding Fathers! [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
(by Peter Hirtle) On 10-11 March, the Copyright Office sponsored a roundtable on the problem of orphan works: works protected by copyright whose authors cannot be located. [read post]
How a watch manufacturer could make the use of foreign manuscripts and artwork a copyright violation
12 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
(by Peter Hirtle) One wouldn’t normally expect a lawsuit between a watch manufacturer (Omega) and a big-box retailer (COSTCO) about the scope of “gray-market” sales of manufactured goods to have much of an impact on libraries and archives, but the upcoming Supreme Court case of Costco v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:23 pm
(By Peter Hirtle) By now most archivists and many librarians will have heard something about the controversy concerning the use of material found in Special Collections at the University of Arkansas. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:17 pm
Our good friend, Peter Hirtle, has been keeping track of these two lawsuits, and he just informed us that both cases have settled. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:32 am
Guidance for users of Orphan Works(And while you're at that blog, don't miss Peter Hirtle's July 5, 2009 post on: They Myth of the pre-1923 Public Domain) [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:43 am
Copyright Office5) Peter Hirtle's Copyright Chart6) Stanford University's Copyright and Fair Use website [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 3:15 pm
Note that Peter Hirtle is one of the presenters :> Hat tip to Richard Kim at digitization@metro . http://metroblogs.typepad.com/dig/2006/12/metro_copyright.html [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
In 1978 and 1998 Congress extended, reshaped and expanded copyright durations and the scope of copyright for existing and future works (see Peter Hirtle’s authoritative website for the gory details)…. [read post]
27 May 2013, 6:00 am
Peter Hirtle of Cornell University, however, told The Economist that there is “no basis for the Conan Doyle estate to claim general ownership over aspects of Holmes from stories that are in the public domain. [read post]
