Search for: "Peter Margulies"
Results 281 - 300
of 375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2021, 12:38 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies explained the recent federal court ruling on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Peter Margulies wrote that to contain Iran, the U.S. will need to make tangible gains on the ground while also gaining moral legitimacy based on international norms. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
In other Supreme Court news, Peter Margulies assessed the oral arguments in Sessions v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 9:50 am
Peter Margulies detailed the context for the Supreme Court’s travel ban orders. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm
Peter Margulies analyzed the Fourth Circuit arguments, arguing that they brought the opposing positions into sharper relief on how to read candidate and President Trump’s statements as evidence of motive. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 11:43 am
Peter Margulies reviewed a new report on surveillance policy from the Center for a New American Security. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 5:46 am
The trio’s post adds to Lawfare’s growing body of work on the subject, which includes commentary from Robert Loeb, Peter Margulies, Benjamin Wittes, Steve Vladeck, and Orin Kerr. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:53 am
Peter Margulies discussed the travel ban challengers’ new strategies in the Dec. 8 oral arguments at the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 7:45 am
Peter Margulies considered what institutional reforms at the FBI should take place in the wake of the report's description of concerning flaws in the FISA process. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am
Peter Margulies and Josh Blackman both weighed in on the IRAP argument. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am
Peter Margulies analyzed the arguments made that related to the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
23 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
With respect to the statutory issues, Travel Ban 3.0 is actually more blatantly illegal than its predecessor, as explained by immigration law scholar Peter Margulies (who thought the previous version was within the president's power, in part because of its temporary nature). [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:27 am
(For an excellent overview of the issues, see the exchange between Steve Vladeck and Peter Margulies over at Lawfare, starting here and here.In Ex parte Quirin the Supreme Court recognized a limited exception to the constitutional requirement of trying crimes in Article III courts. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Peter Margulies and Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia weigh in on Trump v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies linked to an article he has written responding to critics of the 215 program who complain that FISC has interpreted the statute’s “relevance” standard overly broadly. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:21 pm
” Be sure to check out Alan’s excellent post summarizing the ruling, and Peter Margulies’s comments from yesterday. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies then examined the report’s treatment of human rights concerns. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 8:30 am
Here are videos of recent online talks I gave about my book Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration and Political Freedom for the Cato Institute (with commentary by economist Bryan Caplan and immigration law scholar Peter Margulies), and the University of Torcuato Di Tella law faculty Seminar on Law, Economics, and Regulation (Argentina). [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
And Peter Margulies posted about a FedSoc debate where he argued in favor of extraterritorial application of the ICCPR against Edwin Williamson against Nick Rostow. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Peter Margulies and Ben each offered thoughts on the opinion this morning. [read post]
