Search for: "Peter Margulies" Results 281 - 300 of 375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
Peter Margulies summarized some of the discussion at a recent Yale Information Society Project Symposium. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
And Peter Margulies posted about a FedSoc debate where he argued in favor of extraterritorial application of the ICCPR against Edwin Williamson against Nick Rostow. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
His criticisms invited an immediate response from Peter Margulies who defended the propriety of the drafting process. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
I want to take issue with Peter Margulies’s laudatory remarks this weekend about the Harold Koh memos on extraterritorial application of the ICCPR and the CAT—you know, those memos that mysteriously showed up in the New York Times just as the United States was preparing to present its views on the ICCPR to the UN panel that oversees the treaty. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:34 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Peter Margulies (Roger Williams University School of Law) has posted Evolving Relevance: The Metadata Program and the Delicate Balance of Secrecy, Deliberation, and National Security on SSRN. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 7:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Peter Margulies linked to an article he has written responding to critics of the 215 program who complain that FISC has interpreted the statute’s “relevance” standard overly broadly. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am by Yishai Schwartz
Peter Margulies defended 702 collection as consistent with international norms, and insisted that the American surveillance program actually contains greater safeguards than their European counterparts. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:36 am by Yishai Schwartz
Peter Margulies gave a harsher attack on the report, arguing that the Review Group vastly underestimated the efficacy of the bulk metadata collection program, failed to consider the potential for abuse in trusting this data to the private sector and ignored safeguards currently in place. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
Peter Margulies and Ben each offered thoughts on the opinion this morning. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am by Benjamin Wittes
Clapper, I am largely, though not completely, in agreement with Peter Margulies’s assessment of the matter. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Nick Basciano
Peter Margulies explained that while the Report has a few good ideas, its more extreme solutions rely more heavily on “sloganeering” than on convincing analysis. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am by Nick Basciano
Peter Margulies thought the case did address the First Amendment issues in substantive manner and gave an explanation of why. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 3:26 am by Matt Danzer
” Thus, by finding that the conviction could rest solely on Mehanna’s trip to Yemen, the court avoids any deeper discussion of the interesting First Amendment questions that Peter Margulies and David Cole raised last year. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:40 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The Mehanna case sparked a big First Amendment debate—on this site between David Cole and Peter Margulies (see also here and here)—during and after his prosecution in Massachusetts for alleged conspiracy to provide material support to Al Qaeda. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am by Ritika Singh
 Check out Wells and Raff’s recap, as well as Peter Margulies’ thoughts, and, of course, our Al Bahlul Case Page. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Catch up on all the action this weekend: Steve’s critique of the brief, which was authored, among others, by law professor Peter MarguliesPeter’s response; Steve’s reply; Peter’s sur-reply; Steve’s last word; and Peter’s (further!) [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
Thanks to his “sur-reply”, I finally understand the premise of Peter Margulies’s argument—and his amicus brief—in al Bahlul with regard to why the en banc D.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
We are very pleased to announce Lawfare‘s first e-book, Lawfare on the National Defense Authorization Acts, which is now available in Kindle format on Amazon for $4.99. [read post]
29 May 2013, 1:22 am
Harrison Dinniss, Keeping the Cyber Peace: International Legal Aspects of Cyber Activities in Peace Operations Yoram Dinstein, Cyber War and International Law: Concluding Remarks at the 2012 Naval War College International Law Conference Forum: Geography of WarAshley Deeks, The Geography of Cyber Conflict: Through a Glass Darkly Louise Arimatsu, The Law of State Responsibility in Relation to Border Crossings: An Ignored Legal Paradigm Peter Margulies, Networks in… [read post]