Search for: "Peter Margulies"
Results 81 - 100
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2022, 2:23 am
Immigration's Law's Boundary Problem: Determining the Scope of Executive Discretion by Peter Margulies, forthcoming Hastings Law Journal Abstract In immigration law, executive discretion has become contested terrain. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:15 pm
The next round in the Margulies-Heller exchange (here and here) comes from Peter: Thanks to Kevin for his very thoughtful response. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:17 am
Deconstructing'“Sanctuary Cities': The Legality of Federal Grant Conditions That Require State and Local Cooperation on Immigration Enforcement by Peter Margulies, Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2018 Abstract The term “sanctuary city” has generated more heat than... [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 9:29 am
Peter Margulies (Roger Williams University School of Law) has posted Beyond Absolutism: Legal Institutions in the War on Terror (University of Miami Law Review, Vol. 60, p. 309, 2006) on SSRN. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 4:58 pm
Professor Peter Margulies (Roger Williams) recently published a new book, Law’s Detour: Justice Displaced in the Bush Administration (NYU Press 2010). [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:08 am
I once told my relentlessly optimistic namesake Peter Margulies (no relation) that adding the content of my glass to his would still not fill the container, even though his is always half-full. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 3:30 am
Law professors Peter Margulies and Shoba Wadia, along with WilmerHale, filed an amici curiae brief on behalf of a group of immigration law professors in the travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
Peter Margulies has been producing a lot of interesting scholarship on lawyering and the global war on terror. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 8:13 am
That being said, I can’t leave my friend Peter Margulies’ critique unanswered. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
Professor Peter Margulies A number of law professors have submitted an amici curiae brief in support of the plaintiffs-appellees in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:05 am
Professor Peter Margulies has this detailed analysis on Lawfare of the legal questions currently before the Ninth Circuit in Washington v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:02 am
Here is a somewhat skeptical review of review of Peter Margulies's book LAW’S DETOUR: JUSTICE DISPLACED IN THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION by David S. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:20 am
by Kevin Jon Heller Peter Margulies (Roger Williams) responded to my blogging about criminal membership and al-Bahlul at Lawfare. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:40 am
Peter Margulies, Roger Williams University School of Law, is publishing Advocacy as a Race to the Bottom: Rethinking Limits on Lawyers’ Free Speech, as a Roger Williams University Legal Studies Paper. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 4:34 pm
Peter Margulies writes on Lawfare writes about a recent district court decision: "On Nov. 19, Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 8:10 am
Peter Margulies on Lawfare offers some thoughts on the Supreme Court ruling in August refusing to stay a district court injunction barrinfg the Biden administration’s termination of the “Remain in Mexico” program, formally known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP).... [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 4:59 am
Peter Margulies on Lawfare reviews Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom by Ilya Somin (Cato Institute Book, Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 10:18 am
" Peter Margulies has this post at the "Lawfare" blog. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:50 pm
Peter Margulies on Lawfare writes on the latest decision in the "travel ban" litigation: "The Ninth Circuit held in a per curiam order on Thursday (summarized here) that, pending a definitive adjudication on the merits, refugees abroad with sponsorship assurances... [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 7:48 am
As the oral arguments in the legal challenge to third version of the Trump travel ban near, Peter Margulies on Lawfare considers the U.S. government’s reliance on the president’s Article II power as a legal justification for the ban. [read post]
