Search for: "Peter Margulies"
Results 101 - 120
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2007, 6:41 am
Posted by Alan Childress Peter Margulies (Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:50 pm
Peter Margulies on Lawfare writes on the latest decision in the "travel ban" litigation: "The Ninth Circuit held in a per curiam order on Thursday (summarized here) that, pending a definitive adjudication on the merits, refugees abroad with sponsorship assurances... [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 7:48 am
As the oral arguments in the legal challenge to third version of the Trump travel ban near, Peter Margulies on Lawfare considers the U.S. government’s reliance on the president’s Article II power as a legal justification for the ban. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:40 am
Peter Margulies, Roger Williams University School of Law, is publishing Advocacy as a Race to the Bottom: Rethinking Limits on Lawyers’ Free Speech, as a Roger Williams University Legal Studies Paper. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:58 pm
Peter Margulies (left), at Roger Williams, has an interesting and timely new article that is forthcoming in the Fordham Int'l L.J called "When to Push the Envelope. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:47 am
Second, al-Bahlul is not charged with Peter’s new crime. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:47 am
Second, al-Bahlul is not charged with Peter’s new crime. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:28 am
" Peter Margulies has this post today at the "Lawfare" blog. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:11 pm
For the two people still following the exchange between me and Peter Margulies over the bottom-side briefing in the al Bahlul D.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:18 am
This term brought a number of very important immigration decisions to the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:48 pm
Peter S. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
” Readers may see in such a conclusion (and in our post, more generally) a fair amount of tension with Jack’s “longer view” of al Bahlul from yesterday, and with today’s analysis by Peter Margulies with respect to Congress’s power to “define” international law. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am
Clapper, I am largely, though not completely, in agreement with Peter Margulies’s assessment of the matter. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 10:35 am
Peter Margulies recently discussed the effect of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Clapper v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:07 am
Peter’s third point is to my mind his strongest. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:03 am
On November 26, Judge Michael H. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm
Thanks to his “sur-reply”, I finally understand the premise of Peter Margulies’s argument—and his amicus brief—in al Bahlul with regard to why the en banc D.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Catch up on all the action this weekend: Steve’s critique of the brief, which was authored, among others, by law professor Peter Margulies; Peter’s response; Steve’s reply; Peter’s sur-reply; Steve’s last word; and Peter’s (further!) [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:35 pm
Another perspective on this case worth highlighting comes from Professor Peter Margulies. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:00 am
On Tuesday, Peter Margulies looked at both the Majority and Minority’s claims over the efficacy of torture, arguing that ultimately, ruling out EIT’s is a “normative judgement,” and that judgement must be made while understanding the risks of the decision if it is to endure. [read post]
