Search for: "Peter Margulies" Results 101 - 120 of 372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2017, 2:50 pm by Immigration Prof
Peter Margulies on Lawfare writes on the latest decision in the "travel ban" litigation: "The Ninth Circuit held in a per curiam order on Thursday (summarized here) that, pending a definitive adjudication on the merits, refugees abroad with sponsorship assurances... [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 7:48 am by Immigration Prof
As the oral arguments in the legal challenge to third version of the Trump travel ban near, Peter Margulies on Lawfare considers the U.S. government’s reliance on the president’s Article II power as a legal justification for the ban. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:40 am by Media Law Prof
Peter Margulies, Roger Williams University School of Law, is publishing Advocacy as a Race to the Bottom: Rethinking Limits on Lawyers’ Free Speech, as a Roger Williams University Legal Studies Paper. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:58 pm
Peter Margulies (left), at Roger Williams, has an interesting and timely new article that is forthcoming in the Fordham Int'l L.J called "When to Push the Envelope. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:47 am by Robert Chesney
  Second, al-Bahlul is not charged with Peter’s new crime. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:47 am by Robert Chesney
Second, al-Bahlul is not charged with Peter’s new crime.   [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:11 pm by Steve Vladeck
For the two people still following the exchange between me and Peter Margulies over the bottom-side briefing in the al Bahlul D.C. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:18 am by Immigration Prof
This term brought a number of very important immigration decisions to the Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:51 am by Steve Vladeck
” Readers may see in such a conclusion (and in our post, more generally) a fair amount of tension with Jack’s “longer view” of al Bahlul from yesterday, and with today’s analysis by Peter Margulies with respect to Congress’s power to “define” international law. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am by Benjamin Wittes
Clapper, I am largely, though not completely, in agreement with Peter Margulies’s assessment of the matter. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 10:35 am by Alan Rozenshtein
Peter Margulies recently discussed the effect of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Clapper v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:07 am by Benjamin Wittes
Peter’s third point is to my mind his strongest. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
Thanks to his “sur-reply”, I finally understand the premise of Peter Margulies’s argument—and his amicus brief—in al Bahlul with regard to why the en banc D.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Catch up on all the action this weekend: Steve’s critique of the brief, which was authored, among others, by law professor Peter MarguliesPeter’s response; Steve’s reply; Peter’s sur-reply; Steve’s last word; and Peter’s (further!) [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:35 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Another perspective on this case worth highlighting comes from Professor Peter Margulies. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:00 am by Cody Poplin
On Tuesday, Peter Margulies looked at both the Majority and Minority’s claims over the efficacy of torture, arguing that ultimately, ruling out EIT’s is a “normative judgement,” and that judgement must be made while understanding the risks of the decision if it is to endure. [read post]