Search for: "Peter Margulies"
Results 141 - 160
of 375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
Peter Margulies argued the court was right to restrain the ban as a probable violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:07 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Peter Margulies argued that the Hawaii federal district court rightly blocked the implementation of the most recent travel ban on the basis that it violates the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 2:41 am
Peter Margulies on Lawfare writes: "On Tuesday, Judge Derrick Watson of the federal district court in Hawaii issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against President Donald Trump’s third executive order... [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:38 pm
As immigration law scholar Peter Margulies (who believes that Travel Ban 2.0 was legal) explains, the new order is actually more vulnerable to these statutory objections than the old one, because of its more sweeping nature. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am
Peter Margulies disagreed, arguing it undermined the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 2:32 pm
Russell Spivak summarized the president’s action, whose legality Josh Blackman defends and Peter Margulies questions. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:50 am
Peter Margulies argued that the travel ban proclamation undermines the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:44 pm
Peter Margulies has this commentary on Lawfare on Trump's latest travel ban. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:55 pm
Or, as Peter Margulies puts it (channeling Woody Allen), it is a “travesty of a mockery of a sham. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm
Peter Margulies points out that beyond constitutional doubts, there still may be statutory problems with the new proclamation: The policy amounts to nationality-based discrimination with respect to the issuance of visas in violation of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:32 am
Wittes posted the “Boris and Natasha Buy a Facebook Ad” Edition of Rational Security: Peter Margulies first flagged and then discussed the Supreme Court’s stay on part of the Ninth Circuit’s order last week in the case against President Trump’s revised "travel ban. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith highlighted his essay in The Atlantic, “A Trump Damage Assessment” Peter Margulies flagged the Supreme Court’s stay on the Ninth Circuit’s order to admit refugees with assurance of sponsorship in the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 4:35 am
Peter Margulies shared his thoughts on the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:50 pm
Peter Margulies on Lawfare writes on the latest decision in the "travel ban" litigation: "The Ninth Circuit held in a per curiam order on Thursday (summarized here) that, pending a definitive adjudication on the merits, refugees abroad with sponsorship assurances... [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 2:31 pm
The contributors to the symposium include Eric Posner (University of Chicago), Asha Rangappa (Yale), Judith Resnik (Yale), Peter Margulies (Roger Williams), and others. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:34 pm
Va.), Laurie Blank (Emory), Bill Banks (Syracuse), Chris Jenks (SMU), Sudha Setty (Western New England), Peter Margulies (Roger Williams), and Liam O’Melinn (ONU). [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 1:29 pm
Bans, Borders, and Justice: Judicial Review of Immigration Law in the Trump Administration by Peter Margulies Abstract President Donald Trump’s Executive Order has spurred intense debate and litigation that in June, 2017 reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 4:09 am
Peter Margulies explained how the court’s decision balanced the equities in the case: it allowed the district court’s expanded list of family relationship exemptions from the ban to stay in place, but also permitted the Trump administration to prevent entry of refugees without “close” family relationships to U.S. individuals, even if they have received assurances from refugee resettlement agencies in the U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:06 am
” At the ImmigrationProf Blog, Peter Margulies observes that “the Court left the door open to revisit its order once the Ninth Circuit rules on the government’s appeal of Judge Watson’s injunction,” and hopes “that the Ninth Circuit will uphold the district court on exempting refugee assurances from the EO, and the Supreme Court will then permit Judge Watson’s entire order to go into effect. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Peter Margulies flagged Hawaii’s response to the federal government’s motion for a temporary stay of Hawaii District Court Judge Derrick Watson’s injunction concerning President Trump’s Refugee Executive Order (EO). [read post]
