Search for: "Peter S. Margulies"
Results 81 - 100
of 342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2011, 8:47 am
Second, al-Bahlul is not charged with Peter’s new crime. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:18 am
This term brought a number of very important immigration decisions to the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:28 am
" Peter Margulies has this post today at the "Lawfare" blog. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 7:11 pm
For the two people still following the exchange between me and Peter Margulies over the bottom-side briefing in the al Bahlul D.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:48 pm
Peter S. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:03 am
District Court for the District of Oregon issued a preliminary injunction against the operation of President Trump’s October immigration proclamation. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
” Readers may see in such a conclusion (and in our post, more generally) a fair amount of tension with Jack’s “longer view” of al Bahlul from yesterday, and with today’s analysis by Peter Margulies with respect to Congress’s power to “define” international law. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 5:41 am
Clapper, I am largely, though not completely, in agreement with Peter Margulies’s assessment of the matter. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 10:35 am
Peter Margulies recently discussed the effect of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Clapper v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Catch up on all the action this weekend: Steve’s critique of the brief, which was authored, among others, by law professor Peter Margulies; Peter’s response; Steve’s reply; Peter’s sur-reply; Steve’s last word; and Peter’s (further!) [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm
Thanks to his “sur-reply”, I finally understand the premise of Peter Margulies’s argument—and his amicus brief—in al Bahlul with regard to why the en banc D.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:35 pm
Another perspective on this case worth highlighting comes from Professor Peter Margulies. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:07 am
Peter’s third point is to my mind his strongest. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:00 am
On Tuesday, Peter Margulies looked at both the Majority and Minority’s claims over the efficacy of torture, arguing that ultimately, ruling out EIT’s is a “normative judgement,” and that judgement must be made while understanding the risks of the decision if it is to endure. [read post]
2 May 2019, 12:56 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies explored the weaknesses of President Trump’s proposed asylum policies. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 1:38 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies analyzed Judge Jay Bybee’s recent ruling on the Trump administration’s asylum ban order. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:00 am
I want to take issue with Peter Margulies’s laudatory remarks this weekend about the Harold Koh memos on extraterritorial application of the ICCPR and the CAT—you know, those memos that mysteriously showed up in the New York Times just as the United States was preparing to present its views on the ICCPR to the UN panel that oversees the treaty. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:11 am
Peter Margulies reflected on judicial deference in light of litigation involving the transgender service ban, DACA and the census. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Joseph Margulies is a Professor of Law and Government at Cornell University. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Joseph Margulies is a Professor of Law and Government at Cornell University. [read post]
