Search for: "Peters v. The State of Texas" Results 1 - 20 of 618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Immigration Prof
This is the latest installment of the ImmigrationProf blog on-line symposium on the Fifth Circuit's ruling on Monday in Texas v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 2:49 pm by Immigration Prof
Peter Shane in the Washington Monthly does not have much use for the Supreme Court's recent refusal to stay an injunction while an appeal is [pending in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:59 am by Mark Temple
The Texas Supreme Court, in Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
Attorney)Source of Law: United StatesVerdict or Settlement Amount: N/ALegal Claims: Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFraudTheftOtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas: Dallas DivisionLegal Counsel: Douglas A Morris (Federal Public Defender - Dallas); Ahmed Ghappour (University of Texas Law School), Charles D. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
If Peter raises the First Amendment as a defense, he loses--even though Deirdre is invoking the power of the state (in the form of the judge) to obtain an order to Peter that he pay damages.Some readers at this point might be thinking: what about Shelley v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993), on the standards for expert testimony, with 24 departing states, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
District Court for the Northern District of Texas on September 12, 2012. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
District Court for the Northern District of Texas on September 12, 2012. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Steve Hall
"Court Questions Constitutionality of Upcoming Texas Execution," is Peter Malof's post at Texas News Service. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 7:20 pm by Peter Reap
Peter ReapCCHThe federal district court in Tyler, Texas, correctly construed the term “mountable” in a patent for a digital picture frame asserted by Profectus Technology against the manufacturers and sellers of tablet computer devices as “having a feature for mounting,” the U.S. [read post]