Search for: "Petersen v. State Bar"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States, wherein the university barred interracial dating due to their religious beliefs. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
§ 1983, alleging that they had assaulted and beaten him in a bar using nightsticks and fists. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 8:00 am
Anita Martin for Marlene Hill v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 9:58 am
The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act generally bars lawsuits against foreign countries in U.S. courts unless one of a few narrow exceptions applies. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm
Another decision is Public Citizen v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm
The first amendment combined with the supreme court’s 1964 landmark case of New York Times v Sullivan means that the bar is set very high for celebrities or public figures who want to sue for defamation. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
[v] The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial at 25-29. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
Supreme Court decided Missouri v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:44 am
Authored by Kyle Petersen Last week, in Fisher v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Petersen and Mitchell Stein. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am
District Court, District or Connecticut; New York and Connecticut state courts.EducationLaw: Vanderbilt University, J.D. (1998)Undergraduate: State University of New York, B.S., summa cum/aude (1991)Bar Admission(s)New York; Connecticut, U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
However, in another German case before the ECJ, Petersen v Berufungsausschuss fuer Zahnaertze fuer den Bezirk Westfalen-Lippe it was not justifiable for a maximum age of 68 to be imposed on doctors and dentists practising in the state medical system where it was alleged that the rule was necessary to protect patients from a decline in performance as doctors and dentists got older: no such age limit existed in the private sector. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 3:08 am
Here is a Second Department Case: Petersen v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, P.C. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
More details coming For publication opinions today (5): In Jill Petersen v. [read post]