Search for: "Petit v. Minnesota"
Results 221 - 240
of 577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am
O’Brien v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit issued a unanimous per curiam decision in Washington v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
From Fideldy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Minnesota, 14-1470, and Birchfield v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:58 am
The issue in Hawley v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Univ. of Minnesota, 57 F. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
Fillmore County, Minnesota, 20-7028, concerns members of the Swartzentruber Amish community of Fillmore County, Minnesota, who object on religious grounds to using septic systems to treat wastewater at their houses, and instead wish to use “mulch-basin systems” to treat wastewater. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Minnesota, 06-8273). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 9:20 am
Paul, Minnesota VA Regional Office Vets’ Rep at BVA: American Legion Date of BVA Decision: July 7, 2016 Date of Decision: March 9, 2018 The post Case Review: #16-3564, Gerhardson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:33 am
” The Commission’s psychological screening process had been reviewed and approved by the Appellate Division [Keryc v Nassau County Civil Service Commission, et al, 143 AD2d 669]. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:51 am
However, in the case of Shaffer v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:08 am
” At American Thinker, Wen Fa weighs in on the pending cert petition in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:26 pm
The Supreme Court in Storer v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:07 am
Mark Dayton, Minnesota Democrat, has left Congress. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
” At the Associated Press, Jessica Gresko looks at Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:23 am
Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931). [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am
Minnesota (11-1074). [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 9:22 pm
If they file petitions for grant review and if CAAF denies them, their cases could become final before the Supremes rule in Melendez-Diaz, and they could then be left testing Melendez-Diaz's retroactive effect under Teague v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
