Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 13,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm by John Elwood
We should know in a week or two whether this petition will have legs. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:39 am by John Coyle
Supreme Court handed down its decision in Great Lakes Insurance SE v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Among the cases in which the Court denied certiorari on today's order list is South Carolina State Ports Authority v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In the standoff between Texas and the United States gov't over Gov. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
 on Cleaver’s petition challenging California’s exclusion), and even since then it’s been far more common for states to permit ineligible candidates to be on the ballot than to exclude them.) [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:20 pm by Unknown
Johnson (Criminal Jurisdiction; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 2:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On July 14, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied the plaintiff’s petition for an appeal. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm by Marty Lederman
     That the presidency is not an “office, civil or military, under the United States” for purposes of the first, “Positions” Clause of Section 3. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Instead, Chase was adjudicating a habeas petition from a defendant sentenced by Judge Sheffey who was asking to have Sheffey’s actions declared invalid on grounds that the judge was acting ultra vires due to his Se [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm by Kalvis Golde
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]