Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 13,487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm by Marty Lederman
     That the presidency is not an “office, civil or military, under the United States” for purposes of the first, “Positions” Clause of Section 3. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Instead, Chase was adjudicating a habeas petition from a defendant sentenced by Judge Sheffey who was asking to have Sheffey’s actions declared invalid on grounds that the judge was acting ultra vires due to his Se [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm by Kalvis Golde
Miniard 23-444Issue: Whether, when counsel is physically present, state action is required before a court may find a complete denial of counsel under United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
(The Supreme Court is scheduled to consider Griffin’s petition for review of the state court’s ruling at its conference on Feb. 16.) [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's complaint simply stated "the coworker was less qualified and less experienced than [Plaintiff]" rather than allege coworker had the same job title as Plaintiff, had the same responsibilities or job requirements as Plaintiff, reported to the same supervisors as Plaintiff, or that she was even employed in the same unit as Plaintiff. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Plaintiff's complaint simply stated "the coworker was less qualified and less experienced than [Plaintiff]" rather than allege coworker had the same job title as Plaintiff, had the same responsibilities or job requirements as Plaintiff, reported to the same supervisors as Plaintiff, or that she was even employed in the same unit as Plaintiff. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 8:22 pm by Solomon L. Wisenberg
Supreme Court recently granted the Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed in Fischer v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
§1153(h)(3), severely limiting which derivative beneficiaries of visa petitions could retain their parents’ priority dates. [read post]